Based on the March 2025 Gazette notification on the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), here's a comparative report highlighting:
-
Key insights not clearly visible in the notification but crucial
-
Provisions that may be reconsidered or removed for employee benefit
-
Policy suggestions to enhance the UPS
I. Key Insights (Beyond What the UPS Notification States)
Feature | OPS | NPS | UPS (as per Notification) | Observation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nature of Pension | Defined Benefit (50% of last pay + DA) | Market-linked | Hybrid: Assured Payout + Benchmark Corpus-based | UPS tries balance but can result in lower benefits if corpus is less |
Minimum Pension Guarantee | Yes | No | Rs. 10,000/month after 10 years | Not inflation-indexed; could be inadequate in future |
Government Contribution | Full liability | 14% (CG) + 10% (Employee) | Equal match: 10% by Govt. & Employee + 8.5% in pool | Reduced employer responsibility vs OPS |
Risk on Market Volatility | No | Yes | Yes (for shortfall below benchmark corpus) | Shortfall recovery burden on subscriber |
Family Pension | Yes, lifelong to spouse | Annuity-based, limited | 60% of admissible payout (if conditions met) | Not at par with OPS; no children/special needs provision |
Partial Withdrawal | Not applicable | Limited | Allowed 3 times, for specific purposes only | Still restrictive in genuine emergencies |
DA Benefit | Yes, regular | No | Yes, but only on admissible payout | Starts only post-payout phase, no interim protection |
II. Provisions in the UPS Notification that May Be Removed or Reconsidered
-
Clause: Replenishment of Shortfall in Corpus
-
Concern: If individual corpus is lower than benchmark corpus, payout is reduced unless replenished by subscriber.
-
Suggestion: Remove burden from subscriber. Government should fund the gap from the pool corpus.
-
-
Clause: Final Withdrawal Cap at 60%
-
Concern: This limits flexibility even if corpus is sufficient.
-
Suggestion: Allow up to 100% withdrawal if benchmark corpus is met or exceeded.
-
-
Clause: Option Irrevocability
-
Concern: Once opted for UPS, employees cannot revert. No flexibility if terms prove disadvantageous.
-
Suggestion: Allow re-option within a cooling-off period (say 1 year) or after 5 years.
-
-
Clause: Monthly Payout Based on “Average of Last 12 Months”
-
Concern: If employee’s pay is reduced due to leave/medical/suspension in last year, pension is adversely affected.
-
Suggestion: Take higher of 12-month average or last basic pay drawn.
-
-
Clause: Family Pension Only to Spouse
-
Concern: Excludes dependent children, disabled dependents, parents.
-
Suggestion: Extend family payout provisions to dependent children or nominated dependents.
-
III. Suggestions to Improve UPS for Employee Welfare
-
Link Minimum Guaranteed Pension with DA or CPI
-
A static Rs. 10,000/month could become negligible in future. Make it inflation-indexed.
-
-
Hybrid Model with Tiered Security
-
Tier I: Minimum Government-guaranteed pension (e.g., Rs. 15,000)
-
Tier II: Market-based optional corpus to top-up pension
-
-
Separate Medical Coverage or Integration with CGHS for Retirees
-
OPS retirees get CGHS benefits. Include similar guaranteed post-retirement health security under UPS.
-
-
Allow Pension Commutation
-
Introduce optional commutation of pension (as in OPS) for urgent needs at retirement.
-
-
Clarify Pool Corpus Utilization
-
Transparency and audit on pool corpus usage should be mandatory, ensuring it's used for employee support, not admin costs.
-
-
Simplify Application and Withdrawal Process
-
Especially for family members/spouses after demise of UPS subscribers.
-